Are postural restrictions after an Epley maneuver unnecessary? First results of a controlled study and review of the literature



      Postural restrictions after canalith repositioning maneuvers (CRM) for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo of the posterior semicircular canal (p-BPPV) have no proven value and therefore most physicians regard them as unnecessary. The aim of this study was to assess the short-term efficacy of head and body movement limitations after a single Epley maneuver. A review of the literature was performed to assess the current level of evidence for the efficacy of postural restrictions.

      Materials and methods

      Sixty-four patients, median age 59 years (range 37–82 years), with p-BPPV, were allocated either to instructions for movement restrictions or free movements for 48 h after a single Epley maneuver. The minimization method was used for allocation to treatment. This procedure ‘minimizes’ the differences in the distribution of pre-specified prognostic factors (e.g. sex and age) between the two groups of treatment. Minimization was preferred over randomization which is not as effective in balancing baseline characteristics when the number of participants is small. Outcome was assessed by physician and patient reported measures (Dix-Hallpike test, subjective vertigo intensity in a 10-point scale, patient's assessment of improvement) within 1 week after treatment by an independent investigator. The level of statistical significance was 0.05.


      More patients with movement restrictions reported a subjective improvement after treatment (p = 0.007). Ninety percent of patients with movement restrictions and 74.2% of patients with free movements had a negative follow up Dix-Hallpike test but the difference was not significant (p = 0.108). The mean pre-treatment vertigo intensity was reduced from 6.07 and 5.97 to 1.18 and 2.86, respectively but the difference was not significant (p = 0.122).


      Postural restrictions do not increase the efficacy of the canal-repositioning maneuver despite the fact that patients report a subjective improvement after post-procedural instructions. In the review of the literature, all studies except one conclude that postural restrictions are unnecessary. However, a number of methodological issues such as inadequate sample size are not addressed and more conclusive evidence is required. Based on current evidence, the use of postural restrictions after the canal-repositioning maneuver is unjustified.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Auris Nasus Larynx
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Caruso G.
        • Nuti D.
        Epidemiological data from 2270 PPV patients.
        Audiol Med. 2005; 3: 7-11
        • Hall S.F.
        • Ruby R.R.
        • McClure J.A.
        The mechanics of benign paroxysmal vertigo.
        J Otolaryngol. 1979; 8: 151-158
        • Schuknecht H.F.
        Arch Otolaryngol. 1969; 90: 765-778
        • Lopez-Escamez J.A.
        • Gamiz M.J.
        • Fernandez-Perez A.
        • Gomez-Finana M.
        Long-term outcome and health-related quality of life in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.
        Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2005; 262: 507-511
        • Epley J.M.
        The canalith repositioning procedure: for treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1992; 107: 399-404
        • Hilton M.
        • Pinder D.
        The Epley (canalith repositioning) manoeuvre for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; : CD003162
        • Herdman S.J.
        • Tusa R.J.
        Revolutions in treatment of posterior canal benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.
        Audiol Med. 2005; 3: 37-44
        • Gananca F.F.
        • Simas R.
        • Gananca M.M.
        • Korn G.P.
        • Dorigueto R.S.
        Is it important to restrict head movement after Epley maneuver?.
        Rev Bras Otorhinolaryngol (Engl Ed). 2005; 71: 764-768
        • Marciano E.
        • Marcelli V.
        Postural restrictions in labyrintholithiasis.
        Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2002; 259: 262-265
        • Massoud E.A.
        • Ireland D.J.
        Post-treatment instructions in the nonsurgical management of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.
        J Otolaryngol. 1996; 25: 121-125
        • Roberts R.A.
        • Gans R.E.
        • DeBoodt J.L.
        • Lister J.J.
        Treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo: necessity of postmaneuver patient restrictions.
        J Am Acad Audiol. 2005; 16: 357-366
        • Cohen H.S.
        • Kimball K.T.
        Treatment variations on the Epley maneuver for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.
        Am J Otolaryngol. 2004; 25: 33-37
      1. Tusa RJ, Herdman SJ. Canalith repositioning for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Publication 319: American Academy of Neurology, 19, 1996.

        • Altman D.G.
        • Bland J.M.
        Treatment allocation by minimisation.
        BMJ. 2005; 330: 843
        • Brandt T.
        Vertigo. Its multisensory syndromes.
        2nd ed. Springer, Heidelberg1999
      2. Evans S, Day S, Royston P. Minim programme. 1.5/28-3-90.∼mb55/guide/minim.htm. Accessed 3 March 2005.

        • Brandt T.
        • Huppert D.
        • Hecht J.
        • Karch C.
        • Strupp M.
        Benign paroxysmal positioning vertigo: a long-term follow-up (6–17 years) of 125 patients.
        Acta Otolaryngol. 2006; 126: 160-163
        • Katsarkas A.
        Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV): idiopathic versus post-traumatic.
        Acta Otolaryngol. 1999; 119: 745-749
        • Del Rio M.
        • Arriaga M.A.
        Benign positional vertigo: prognostic factors.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 130: 426-429
        • Simoceli L.
        • Bittar R.S.
        • Greters M.E.
        Posture restrictions do not interfere in the results of canalith repositioning maneuver.
        Rev Bras Otorhinolaryngol (Engl Ed). 2005; 71: 55-59
        • Magliulo G.
        • Bertin S.
        • Ruggieri M.
        • Gagliardi M.
        Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo and post-treatment quality of life.
        Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2005; 262: 627-630
        • Pollak L.
        • Davies R.A.
        • Luxon L.L.
        Effectiveness of the particle repositioning maneuver in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo with and without additional vestibular pathology.
        Otol Neurotol. 2002; 23: 79-83
        • Moon S.J.
        • Bae S.H.
        • Kim H.D.
        • Kim J.H.
        • Cho Y.B.
        The effect of postural restrictions in the treatment of benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.
        Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2005; 262: 408-411
        • Gordon C.R.
        • Gadoth N.
        Repeated vs. single physical maneuver in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.
        Acta Neurol Scand. 2004; 110: 166-169
        • Herdman S.J.
        • Tusa R.J.
        • Zee D.S.
        • Proctor L.R.
        • Mattox D.E.
        Single treatment approaches to benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1993; 119: 450-454
        • Cakir B.O.
        • Ercan I.
        • Cakir Z.A.
        • Turgut S.
        Efficacy of postural restriction in treating benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 132: 501-505