Advertisement

Application of a strip design to monitor the viability of buried radial forearm free flap in East Asians: A case series study

Published:March 20, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2022.03.011

      Abstract

      Objectives

      The objectives of this study were to evaluate the reliability of a strip design as a monitoring flap in buried flap and to investigate whether strip design of radial forearm free flap (RFFF) could affect donor site morbidity in East Asian.

      Methods

      Patients with externalized flap in buried RFFF were consecutively included in this study. For cases with mucosal defect repair, a skin strip with a 1.5 cm width was proximally positioned to the primary flap along with the pedicle. Compared to a mucosal defect, a skin strip was distally positioned overlying the pedicle (near the wrist) when the flap was used for reinforcing the facial contour, reconstructing sacrificed facial nerve, or reanimating facial expression. The externalized flap formation was performed after completion of anastomoses of vessels. Monitoring results of flap failure using an externalized monitoring flap and additional morbidity of donor site were evaluated.

      Results

      Nine patients were included in this study. Although there were two cases of pharyngeal fistula due to mucosal necrosis of resection margin, transferred RFFF was viable in all cases. The externalized flap provided reliable monitoring for the buried RFFF without a case of necrosis even in two cases with a partial detachment of septocutaneous branches between the radial artery and the designed skin strip. There was no false - positive case. Therefore, the sensitivity and positive predictive value of the externalized monitoring flap were 100%. All defects of radial forearm caused by skin strip harvest were also primarily closed without an additional skin graft.

      Conclusion

      A strip design for externalized monitoring flap in RFFF can facilitate an easier creation of externalized monitoring flap in cases with buried RFFF without additional morbidity at the donor site compared to a conventional techniques.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Auris Nasus Larynx
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Wong C.H.
        • Wei F.C.
        Microsurgical free flap in head and neck reconstruction.
        Head Neck. 2010; 32 (Sep): 1236-1245
        • Askar I.
        • Oktay M.F.
        • Kilinc N.
        Use of radial forearm free flap with palmaris longus tendon in reconstruction of total maxillectomy with sparing of orbital contents.
        J Craniofac Surg. 2003; 14 (Mar): 220-227
        • Haller J.R.
        • Shelton C.
        Medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve: a new donor graft for repair of facial nerve defects at the skull base.
        Laryngoscope. 1997; 107 (Aug): 1048-1052
        • Harris B.N.
        • Tollefson T.T.
        Facial reanimation: evolving from static procedures to free tissue transfer in head and neck surgery.
        Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015; 23 (Oct): 399-406
        • Vaughan E.D.
        Functional outcomes of free tissue transfer in head and neck cancer reconstruction.
        Oral Oncol. 2009; 45 (Apr-May): 421-430
        • Cristóbal L.
        • Linder S.
        • Lopez B.
        • Mani M.
        • Rodríguez-Lorenzo A.
        Free anterolateral thigh flap and masseter nerve transfer for reconstruction of extensive periauricular defects: surgical technique and clinical outcomes.
        Microsurgery. 2017; 37 (Sep): 479-486
        • Pellini R.
        • Pichi B.
        • Ruggieri M.
        • Ruscito P.
        • Spriano G.
        Venous flow-through flap as an external monitor for buried radial forearm free flap in head and neck reconstruction.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006; 59: 1217-1221
        • Genden E.M.
        • Rinaldo A.
        • Suárez C.
        • Wei W.I.
        • Bradley P.J.
        • Ferlito A.
        Complications of free flap transfers for head and neck reconstruction following cancer resection.
        Oral Oncol. 2004; 40 (Nov): 979-984
        • Ban M.J.
        • Na G.
        • Ko S.
        • Kim J.
        • Heo N.H.
        • Choi E.C.
        • et al.
        Externally monitored versus conventional buried flaps in laryngopharyngeal reconstruction.
        Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2021; 14 (Nov): 407-413
        • Chang T.Y.
        • Lee Y.C.
        • Lin Y.C.
        • Wong S.T.
        • Hsueh Y.Y.
        • Kuo Y.L.
        • et al.
        Implantable doppler probes for postoperatively monitoring free flaps: efficacy. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016; 4 (Nov;28): e1099
        • Song M.
        • Chen S.W.
        • Zhang Q.
        • Yang A.K.
        • Zhuang S.M.
        • Wang L.P.
        • et al.
        External monitoring of buried radial forearm free flaps in hypopharyngeal reconstruction.
        Acta Otolaryngol. 2011; 131 (Feb): 204-209
        • Urken M.L.
        • Futran N.
        • Moscoso J.F.
        • Biller H.F.
        A modified design of the buried radial forearm free flap for use in oral cavity and pharyngeal reconstruction.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994; 120 (Nov): 1233-1239
        • Cha Y.H.
        • Nam W.
        • Cha I.H.
        • Kim H.J.
        Revisiting radial forearm free flap for successful venous drainage.
        Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017; 39 (May 25): 14
        • Kimura T.
        • Ebisudani S.
        • Osugi I.
        • Inagawa K.
        Anatomical analysis of cutaneous perforator distribution in the forearm.
        Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017; 5 (Oct 26): e1550