Advertisement
Original Article|Articles in Press

Preventive effects of skin protectants on the development of medical device-related pressure wounds in endoscopic sinonasal surgery

  • Author Footnotes
    1 Keisuke Miyashita and Kosuke Tochigi contributed equally to this work as the first author.
    Keisuke Miyashita
    Footnotes
    1 Keisuke Miyashita and Kosuke Tochigi contributed equally to this work as the first author.
    Affiliations
    Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Keisuke Miyashita and Kosuke Tochigi contributed equally to this work as the first author.
    Kousuke Tochigi
    Footnotes
    1 Keisuke Miyashita and Kosuke Tochigi contributed equally to this work as the first author.
    Affiliations
    Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kazuhiro Omura
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author.
    Affiliations
    Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan

    Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Satoshi Aoki
    Affiliations
    Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Yasuhiro Tanaka
    Affiliations
    Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Keisuke Miyashita and Kosuke Tochigi contributed equally to this work as the first author.
Published:March 09, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anl.2023.02.005

      Abstract

      Objectives

      Medical device-related pressure ulcer (MDRPU) is a skin or subcutaneous tissue injury caused by medical devices. Skin protectants have been used to prevent MDRPU in other fields. In endoscopic sinonasal surgery (ESNS), rigid endoscopes and forceps can cause MDRPU; however, detailed investigations have not been conducted. This study aimed to investigate the frequency of MDRPU in ESNS and the preventive effects of skin protectants

      Methods

      Thirty-nine patients who received ESNS and consented to study participation were randomly assigned to the “protective agent” (n = 18) or “control” (n = 21) group. MDRPU presence around the nostril was evaluated for up to 7 days post-surgically based on physical findings and subjective symptoms. The occurrence ratio and severity of MDRPU were statistically compared between the groups to evaluate the efficacy of skin protective agents.

      Results

      Stage 1 MDRPU, according to the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel classification, was seen in 20.5% (8/39) of the patients, and no patient had more high-grade ulceration. On postoperative days 2 and 3, skin erythema was predominantly observed on the nasal floor, with a comparatively lower incidence in the protective agent group. Significant pain reduction was observed in the nostril's floor on postoperative days 2 and 3 in the protective agent group.

      Conclusions

      MDRPU occurred with a relatively high frequency around the nostrils after ESNS. Protective agent use in the external nostrils was effective especially in reducing post-operative pain on the nasal floor, where tissue damage can easily occur due to device-related friction.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Auris Nasus Larynx
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Edsberg L.E.
        • Black J.M.
        • Goldberg M.
        • McNichol L.
        • Moore L.
        • Sieggreen M.
        Revised national pressure ulcer advisory panel pressure injury staging system: revised pressure injury staging system.
        J Wound Ostomy Cont Nurs. 2016; 43: 585-597
        • Jackson D.
        • Sarki A.M.
        • Betteridge R.
        • Brooke J.
        Medical device-related pressure ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Int J Nurs Stud. 2019; 92: 109-120
        • Liversedge H.
        Preventing medical device-related skin damage.
        Nurs Stand. 2019; 34: 72-76
        • Rashvand F.
        • Shamekhi L.
        • Rafiei H.
        • Nosrataghaei M.
        Incidence and risk factors for medical device-related pressure ulcers: the first report in this regard in Iran.
        Int Wound J. 2020; 17: 436-442
        • Kassam A.B.
        • Thomas A.
        • Carrau R.L.
        • Snyderman C.H.
        • Vescan A.
        • Prevedello D.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic reconstruction of the cranial base using a pedicled nasoseptal flap.
        Neurosurgery. 2008; 63 (Suppl 1ONS44-52; discussion ONS52-53)
        • Castelnuovo P.
        • Battaglia P.
        • Turri-Zanoni M.
        • Tomei G.
        • Locatelli D.
        • Bignami M.
        • et al.
        Endoscopic endonasal surgery for malignancies of the anterior cranial base.
        World Neurosurg. 2014; 82 (Suppl): S22-S31
        • Krouse J.H.
        • Christmas Jr., D.A.
        Powered instrumentation in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. II: a comparative study.
        Ear Nose Throat J. 1996; 75: 42-44
        • Umemoto S.
        • Kodama S.
        • Tateyama K.
        • Suzuki M.
        Medical device-related pressure ulcers and associated countermeasures in endoscopic sinus surgery.
        Japan J Rhinol. 2018; 57 (Written in Japanese): 24-31
      1. Smith & Nephew Website. https://www.smith-nephew.com/japan/products/woundmanagement/category/skincare/skincare_nasp/. Accessed September 3, 2022.

        • Tokunaga T.
        • Sakashita M.
        • Haruna T.
        • Asaka D.
        • Takeno S.
        • Ikeda H.
        • et al.
        Novel scoring system and algorithm for classifying chronic rhinosinusitis: the JESREC Study.
        Allergy. 2015; 70: 995-1003
        • Hollen P.J.
        • Gralla R.J.
        • Kris M.G.
        • McCoy S.
        • Donaldson G.W.
        • Moinpour C.M.
        A comparison of visual analogue and numerical rating scale formats for the lung cancer symptom scale (LCSS): does format affect patient ratings of symptoms and quality of life?.
        Qual Life Res. 2005; 14: 837-847
        • Dalziel K.
        • Stein K.
        • Round A.
        • Garside R.
        • Royle P.
        Endoscopic sinus surgery for the excision of nasal polyps: a systematic review of safety and effectiveness.
        Am J Rhinol. 2006; 20: 506-519
        • Asaka D.
        • Nakayama T.
        • Hama T.
        • Okushi T.
        • Matsuwaki Y.
        • Yoshikawa M.
        • et al.
        Risk factors for complications of endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis.
        Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2012; 26: 61-64
        • Ko M.T.
        • Chuang K.C.
        • Su C.Y.
        Multiple analyses of factors related to intraoperative blood loss and the role of reverse Trendelenburg position in endoscopic sinus surgery.
        Laryngoscope. 2008; 118: 1687-1691
        • Stammberger H.
        Endoscopic endonasal surgery–concepts in treatment of recurring rhinosinusitis. Part II. Surgical technique.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986; 94: 147-156
        • Kennedy D.W.
        • Zinreich S.J.
        • Rosenbaum A.E.
        • Johns M.E.
        Functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Theory and diagnostic evaluation.
        Arch Otolaryngol. 1985; 111: 576-582
        • Snyderman C.H.
        • Pant H.
        • Carrau R.L.
        • Prevedello D.
        • Gardner P.
        • Kassam A.B.
        What are the limits of endoscopic sinus surgery?: the expanded endonasal approach to the skull base.
        Keio J Med. 2009; 58: 152-160
        • Rogers J.
        • Wilson L.F.
        Preventing recurrent tissue breakdowns after “pressure sore” closures.
        Plas Reconstr Surg. 1975; 56: 419-422
        • Homma T.
        • Ojima T.
        • Shimada Y.
        • Akemoto Y.
        • Yoshimura N.
        Use of Quickfix for tape fixation of chest tubes: a multi-center doctor-nurse questionnaire survey and fixing strength comparison study.
        J Thorac Dis. 2020; 12: 493-503
        • Dahl R.
        • Mygind N.
        Anatomy, physiology and function of the nasal cavities in health and disease.
        Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 1998; 29: 3-12
        • Kim S.W.
        • Park S.O.
        • Choi T.H.
        • Hai D.T.
        Change in upper lip height and nostril sill after alveolar bone grafting in unilateral cleft lip alveolus patients.
        J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012; 65: 558-563
        • Tanaka M.
        • Takahashi Y.
        • Hasegawa K.
        • Ito Y.
        • Nemoto T.
        • Isogai Z.
        The mechanism of persistent undermining of a sacral pressure ulcer: experimental analyses using a deformable model and examination of skin mobility over different anatomical locations.
        J Tissue Viability. 2020; 29: 130-134
        • Hindle A.K.
        • Brody F.
        • Hopkins V.
        • Rosales G.
        • Gonzalez F.
        • Schwartz A.
        Thermal injury secondary to laparoscopic fiber-optic cables.
        Surg Endosc. 2009; 23: 1720-1723
        • Yoshimura T.
        • Kita M.
        • Mizokami T.
        • Ikuta A.
        • Okada H.
        Thermal injury due to the non-contact light source of a laparoscope: a case report and recommendation from a simulation medicine.
        Japan J Gynecol Obs Endosc. 2019; 35 (Written in Japanese): 333-339